sandovrll的部落格

Think you are deed the echt election results when you scrutinize the day news? Think once more. You likely simply cognise that the networks word their "projections" agelong back the votes are counted, and sometimes previously the place are even shut. But what you may not cognize is that they don't document the truthful grades of elections, even after all the votes are counted.

More on that in a moment, but primary I have to william tell you nearly a cellular phone hail as I just now standard. It was a machine system of rules business me, maddening to narrative my responses to a political opinion poll on lots semipublic issues. Never psyche what the residue of the questions were: the most basic one points promptly to the historical complex present. It was, "Do you characterize yourself a Republican or Democrat?"

What rigged question! I don't balance myself to be either, so I have to lie or be excluded from the survey. This was a as a whole overt feelings poll, not one designed for use only by the organizers of republicans or democrats. You can bet that they reported those grades on the daylight info or in newspapers, as sales rep of the generalised opinions of the city - not a moment ago those who are democrats or republicans.

The cross-question points out a focal deficiency in the intelligence reportage on semipolitical issues, which is the premise that at hand are just two diplomatic parties in this bucolic. Do you certainly cognize how heaps semipolitical parties get hundreds of thousands of votes in this territorial division in each election? How would you if none of the communication beginning papers on them.

This premiss that we just have two important parties is steadily deep-seated in our media. This is why the results of elections are not accurately reportable. The ensuing real narrative shows how this happens.

Years ago, look the tv report coverage of the 1980 chief of state election, I started to consideration thing comic. News system of rules after news program reported that Reagan got 55% of the vote, and Carter 45%. You can see that this adds up to 100%, so what happened to the else votes?

Libertarians, Independents (like John Anderson) and others got complete 7 million votes, or 9% of all votes kind. Oh, and by the way, Reagan had 50% of the votes, and Carter 41%. To be honest something like it, the reporters could have at least said, "Of the votes we deliberate important, Reagan got 55%, and Carter got 45%."

There was no agreement here. The tidings producers were right count up just the votes for the two great parties and dividing to get his percentages. The information that they would bury or banish the else votes is simply mood of how potent an inexplicit posit can be.

Of track here are some other semipolitical parties in this rural area. Not news their option tallies precincts their exposure, and helps to hold on to them from increasing. We can have few authentic electable alternatives to the Republicans and Democrats if more society knew that they existed.

Unfortunately, these kinds of "accidental" lies almost election grades keep alive to be told on the video news programs today.